Kód: 04806991

Judging Democracy

Name: Judging Democracy
Brand: Broadview Press Ltd
SKU: 04806991
Price: 963.00 CZK
Availability: BackOrder

Autor Christopher P. Manfredi, Mark Rush

Jazyk: Angličtina
Vazba: Brožovaná
Počet stran: 160
Nakladatelství: Broadview Press Ltd, 2008
Více informací o knize

963 Kč

Dostupnost:

50 % šance

Máme informaci, že by titul mohl být dostupný. Na základě vaší objednávky se ho pokusíme do 6 týdnů zajistit.
Prohledáme celý svět

Informovat o naskladnění

Přidat mezi přání

Mohlo by se vám také líbit

Kendini Yeniden Kesfet
0 Kč

Darujte tuto knihu ještě dnes

Objednejte knihu a zvolte Zaslat jako dárek.
Obratem obdržíte darovací poukaz na knihu, který můžete ihned předat obdarovanému.
Knihu zašleme na adresu obdarovaného, o nic se nestaráte.

Více informací

Informovat o naskladnění knihy

Zašleme vám zprávu jakmile knihu naskladníme

Zadejte do formuláře e-mailovou adresu a jakmile knihu naskladníme, zašleme vám o tom zprávu. Pohlídáme vše za vás.

Nákupem získáte 96 bodů

Anotace knihy

In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory.